Remove Compliance Remove Cosmetics Remove Drugs Remove In-Vitro
article thumbnail

HP&M is Pleased to Welcome Lisa Baumhardt (Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert) and Sophia Gaulkin (Associate) to the Firm

FDA Law Blog

Baumhardt provides counsel to medical device, in vitro diagnostic, and combination product manufacturers on a wide range of pre- and post-marketing regulatory topics. Baumhardt advises clients on complaint handling, MDRs, Quality System Regulation compliance and enforcement matters. In the pre-market area, Ms. In addition, Ms.

article thumbnail

Considerations for Mobile Health Technology Developers: Part 1

pharmaphorum

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation as a medical device. In Part 1 of this series, general wellness devices and mobile medical applications (MMAs) will be considered. Part 2 of this series will be devoted to clinical decision support (CDS) software. The FDA’s General Approach to Regulating mHealth Products.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

HP&M Files Comments Opposing FDA’s Proposed LDT Rule

FDA Law Blog

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act simply did not confer that power upon FDA. The PRIA also omits entire other categories of costs, such compliance with 21 C.F.R. Javitt — On Monday, Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Weighing in at nearly 60 pages, the comments detail extensive flaws in the proposed regulation.

article thumbnail

Considerations for Mobile Health Technology Developers: Part 2

pharmaphorum

On 27th September 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its final guidance for industry and FDA staff clinical decision support (CDS) software, which has been anticipated since the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) listed the guidance as a top priority for fiscal year 2022. Criterion 1. Criterion 2.

article thumbnail

Proposed LDT Rule Raises Many Questions but Provides Few Answers

FDA Law Blog

The crux of the proposed rule lies in the addition of ten words: “ including when the manufacturer of these products is a laboratory.” These words would be added to the definition of “ in vitro diagnostic [IVD] products” in 21 C.F.R. There is much to unpack, and we intend to do so in a series of blog posts.

article thumbnail

FDA Phones a Friend: Joint Statement with CMS Eschews CLIA Modernization and Supports FDA Oversight of LDTs

FDA Law Blog

Medical Device Reporting, Quality System Regulation compliance, and reporting of corrections and removals). The joint press release largely repeats, and has CMS endorse, the arguments FDA has previously made in support of its proposed rule, which we rebut in the detailed comments we filed on behalf of a coalition of laboratories.

article thumbnail

A Question 30 Years in the Making: Would a Final LDT Rule Withstand Judicial Scrutiny?

FDA Law Blog

Gibbs — For more than three decades, FDA has claimed that the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic (FD&C Act) gives the agency legal authority to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices (see our prior post here ).